Friday 30 November 2007

Tempory Speed Restriction Boards

An image from the "Dark Ages", a temporary speed restriction board that is illuminated by gas. No part of this installation was light to carry, it was all heavy and cumbersome. In this instance the speed restriction is a 30mph one, and applies to all traffic.

A slightly later type, relying upon batteries housed in the boxes at the base of the speed boards to provide power for illumination of the speed restriction sign during the hours of darkenss. On the fishtail and on the box holding the 30mph stencil, were light sensitive cells which switched the light source on and off as required. The stencil is of the earlier type used, white numerals on a blue background.

This picture clearly shows a common modification to the bottom of the battery boxes, the addition of lengths of point rodding. This increased stability of the speed restriction signs when they were erected, but the knees, shins, and legs of many a railwayman will bear painful testimony as to how lethal those bits of point rodding could be.

A distant warning board for a tempory speed restriction, this one in a point with restricted clearances, hence to use of a small fishtail. The stencils are of the later type, black numerals on a yellow background, and the speed restriction applies to any trains take the route ahead off to the left. 20mph for freight trains, 60mph for passenger trains.

Modern retroreflective speed restriction signs, these untilise a coating that will reflect any light that falls upon it with almost equal intensity. This is a reminder distant board for trains taking a route on the right, and is commonly used were station platforms and the like fall within the required distance between the site commencement board and the distant warning board.

Retro-reflective.

Retro-reflective.

Termination board at the end of a speed restriction, this one is one of the old battery power variety.

Commencement board, battery powered variety.

Retro-reflective reminder board.

Retro-reflective.

Retro-reflective.

Retro-reflective.

Retro-reflective.

Wednesday 28 November 2007

Railway Art

Left click on images to enlarge, then right click on area off of the image and click on back to return to blog.
Dean Single below Dartmoor, near South Brent, 1913
Acrylic 16in x 24in, painted by
Gerald Broom, GRA
Tebay Troughs, LMS, 1935. 6100 Royal Scot
Acrylic 20in x 28in, painted by
Gerald Broom, GRA
Patriot 45509 The Derbyshire Yoemanry
Watercolour 8in x 10in, painted by
David Charlesworth, GRA
Clifton Road Junction, Rugby 1920, LNWR
Acrylic 22in x 42in, painted by
Gerald Broom, GRA
St Pancras Departure
Oils 16in x 20in, painted by
Philip D. Hawkins
BR Standard at Barry
Oils 7.75in x 13.5in, painted by
Peter Annable, GRA
Calling at Kettering
Painted by Don Breckton
The 5.59pm to Holmfirth
Gouache 14.5in x 10.75in, painted by
Roy Schofield, GRA
A few lines between Preston and Carlisle
Acrylic 18.5in x 21in, painted by
Lawrence Roche, GRA
The Long Drag
Pen and Ink 14in x 10in, drawn by
John Harrison, GRA

Sunday 25 November 2007

Mileposts! More to them than you might think.

Mileposts are one of the most distinctive features of lineside furniture on Britain's railways. They range from clear, well-designed, distinctive products to simple wooden posts with a number painted on them. I would argue - just a little tendentiously, perhaps - that those of the Midland, the North Eastern, and the Caledonian are arguably not only the most interesting designs but also those most fitted to their purpose. And of these I think the Midland's are the clearest of all. Distinctive they most certainly are - the moment you see one, you know which company's line you are looking at, even in the absence of any other information!
All railways were required to provide quarter-mile posts along their lines. Section 94 of the Railways' Clauses Act of 1845 provides that: "The company shall cause the length of the railway to be measured, and milestones, posts, or other conspicuous objects to be set up and maintained along the whole line thereof, at the distance of one quarter of a mile from each other, with numbers or marks inscribed thereon denoting such distances." This provision was never repealed.

The Midland Railway's nineteenth-century practice was no different from that of other companies. Each line had its own zero-point and its own sequence of mileposts. These are shewn clearly on the first-edition 25" Ordnance Survey sheets. Their sequences can also be found on the Midland's 1874 gradient diagrams. Thus mileposts ran from Hitchin to Wigston North Junction, from Rugby to Derby, from Derby to Leeds, from Birmingham to Gloucester, from Bristol to Gloucester, and so on. I know of only one survival of this old mileposting. The zero-point for the Manchester line was at Ambergate, and the sequence of posts ran through to Ashburys East Junction at 46 miles 24 chains. By the time the new mileposts were installed the maintenance responsibilities on the Sheffield & Midland joint line had changed and the Midland no longer looked after the section north of Reddish Junction, with the result that the last "modern" Midland milepost is mp 181 at Reddish Junction, after which the posts still follow the old measurement reading from Ambergate because neither the Great Central company nor its successors ever made any changes thence to Ashburys.
Official Midland drawing showing mileposts for the quarter miles.
Early this century the Midland carried out a systematic re-mileposting of the whole of its system. I am not sure of the precise date of the decision, and I have not myself seen any minute authorising the work. I believe, however, from the evidence of the Distance Diagrams that the task was carried out during 1907. From the first appearance of the diagrams in 1873 up to and including those sheets issued anew in January 1907 the note at the foot of the page about the continuous distances reads: "The continuous Distances are from St Pancras Passenger Station by the Shortest Route." The new editions issued in January 1908 not only shew additional distance information relating to the mileposts but also change this note by the addition of a second line. The first line is a slightly modified version of the original, reading: "The continuous Distances not in brackets are from St Pancras Passenger Station by the Shortest Route." The new second line states: "The continuous Distances in brackets represent the Mile Post Mileage (New)" [no full-stop]. This is the formulation used up to and including sheets issued in January 1913, after which the "(New)" is dropped. Certain sheets, such as those for the West Line, have slightly different formulations for the milepost sentence, to make the situation as clear as possible. Thus, for example, the 1912 issue (fifth edition) of sheet 49 has: "The continuous Distances in Brackets are from London Road Junction, Derby, via Whitacre, Camp Hill, & Redditch, and represent the Mile Post Mileage (New)."

Rear detail on a quarter milepost near Attenborough.
It was this thorough-going re-mileposting of the system that brought about the introduction of the very distinctive Midland mileposts (see the drawing at Figure 4, page 14, in Midland Style by George Dow, Historical Model Railway Society, Bromley 1975). There are three basic styles, one for the full miles, one for the fractions, and one for locations with limited space. The first two are designed to be equally visible from both directions and use the angled design also employed by the company for its station running-in boards. These are the very well known shapes still seen all over the Midland system. In both cases the post can be topped by a small disc to shew the zero-point from which the measurement runs. Much rarer (because not normally necessary) was the use of a flat-plate design, where space was limited. There are two examples of this at Kettering, where milepost 72 posts can be seen on both the up slow and the up fast platforms. An example of a flat-post fraction is at Dock Junction, where milepost (0)¾ is mounted on the wall behind which the line down to the Metropolitan descends. The full-mile "posts" of this type are rectangular and identical to the Midland's bridge-number plates. The fraction "posts" are oval. The mileposts are normally located on the up side of the line - and there are very few exceptions indeed to this rule (such as, for example milepost 30 just south of Luton station). The measurement generally increases in the down direction.

Official Midland drawings showing milepost for 1 to 9 miles.


This re-mileposting was carried out thoroughly systematically. Wherever possible the mileposting runs through from zero at London St Pancras by the shortest route. In other words, wherever there was a facing junction into a branch along the line the posts were continued along the branch in the same sequence. Thus the mileposting from St Pancras runs via Knighton South Junction (97m 46ch) and Saffron Lane Junction (97m 76ch) via Birmingham Curve Junction (126m 40ch) to Leicester Junction (127m 0ch) and Branston Junction (127m 20ch) at Burton-on-Trent, and the measurement from London also ran from Woodville Junction through Woodville and Swadlincote to Swadlincote Junction (where, of course, it then gave way to the shorter direct measurement). Another example is at Dore, where the sequence of mileposts from London via Leicester and Trent is continued from Dore South Junction round the south curve and on to Chinley North Junction, where milepost 174 via the Hope Valley stands only a few yards away from milepost 168½ via Derby North Junction and Matlock. The main line of the Hope Valley line between Dore & Totley Station Junction and Dore West Junction is actually measured from a zero at Dore West! At the Chinley end, the curve between Chinley East Junction and Chinley South Junction continues the shorter measurement from London via Matlock rather than the longer one from London via the Hope Valley. A branch joining the main line by a trailing junction had its own zero-point at the junction and was measured from that point. Thus the Lincoln line begins with a zero at Nottingham London Road Junction. The Syston & Peterborough line is an especially interesting case, since this was originally posted as a single unit. However, in the revised form its central portion, from Manton Junction to Melton Junction, constituted a part of the through route from London to the North via Kettering and Nottingham and was mileposted accordingly. This meant that the eastern section became a branch from Manton to Peterbrooguh meeting the main line in a trailing junction and therefore staring from zero at Manton, whilst the western section became a branch from Syston to Melton Junction meeting the main line by a facing junction at Syston and therefore continuing the sequence from London via Leicester.


Official Midland drawing showing mileposts from 10 to 200 miles.

The principal Midland sequence is of course that of the main line from London to Carlisle. This takes St Pancras as its zero-point and runs via the Bedford Curve, Sharnbrook Summit (passenger lines), Leicester, Trent Station, Clay Cross, the Old Road, Cudworth, Normanton, the Whitehall Curve, and Hellifield to Petterill Bridge Junction at 307 miles 14 chains. This meant that the Midland was one of only two British railway companies to have a milepost 300 on the system (the other being the Great Western). Milepost 300 is quarter of a mile north of Low House Crossing. (Milepost 200 is a quarter of a mile north of Newlay & Horsforth station and milepost 100 is immediately to the north of the former Humberstone Road station in Leicester.)
On the West Line the zero-point is London Road Junction in Derby, and the zero-post is clearly to be seen on the down side of the railway from London (up side towards Bristol). Because the Kingsbury & Water Orton Line was not built till after the re-mileposting, the mileposts take the original and longer route through Whitacre Junction on their route from Derby towards Birmingham, but they then follow the usual shortest-route practice by running from Landor Street Junction direct to St Andrew's Junction and then on to Camp Hill and beyond.

Official Midland drawing depicting how mileposts are positioned in cuttings.


Official Midland drawing depicting how mileposts are positioned on embankments.

The headquarters station of Derby itself is quite an interesting case. As noted, London Road Junction is the zero-point for the West Line. The main sequence of mileposts actually avoided Derby station, running from Spondon Junction through Chaddesden to Derby South Junction and then round the avoiding line to Derby North Junction and on to Ambergate - thus taking, as always, the most direct route from London. The sequence of posts from London continued from Spondon Junction along the Litchurch Loop and through Derby station and to Derby North Junction. There has been an alteration here since the closure of the Chaddesden line: the section of line between the station and the site of Derby North Junction has been back-posted from the north junction, so that there is now a meeting-point in Derby between two sequences, with London Road Junction being 128m 23ch from London via the Litchurch Loop and 127m 54ch measured back from the north junction (as well, of course, as being 0m 0ch for the West Line). At Ambergate the sequence from London continues north to Clay Cross South Junction, where it naturally gives way to the shorter sequence from London via the Erewash Valley and to Manchester.

The 260 and a half milepost near Ais Gil on the Settle and Carlisle line.

Nottingham too is worth comment. Milepost 123½ on the platform of Nottingham station reads from St Pancras via Manton, and the sequence then continues through Nottingham via Mansfield Junction to Trowell Junction, where it gives way to the shorter sequence from London via Leicester and Trent. As I have stated, at the former London Road Junction in Nottingham the Lincoln line trailed into the line from London, so here there is a milepost zero for that line. At Mansfield Junction the mileposts from London via Manton meet the mileposts from London via Leicester, so that the junction is just west of the 124¼ milepost via Manton and a little east of milepost 125¾ from London via Trent.


The 251 milpost between Dent Head Viaduct and Blea Moor Tunnel.

Joint lines did not always, of course, follow the normal pattern. What was done depended on a number of aspects, including the maintenance arrangements. I have already mentioned the case of the northern end of the Sheffield & Midland joint line into Manchester. The southern end of that line duly observes Midland practice, with a zero for the Hayfield branch at New Mills Station Junction and the end of the branch just beyond 2¾ miles. The Swinton & Knottingley line was maintained by the Midland as far as the bridge at Moorthorpe over the West Riding & Grimsby line and it therefore received new Midland mileposts over this section. Many of these have now gone, to be replaced by "second-hand" North Eastern mileposts, but there is a very good Midland 174¾ post still in place on the Moorthorpe Station Junction to South Kirkby Junction curve, where it can be easily seen from any Sheffield to Wakefield service taking the S&K route.


On the whole, Midland mileposts have proved robust and fit for their purpose, and most of them are still in place. Some have been broken - there is an example just north of St Albans at the moment - or lost and have been replaced by more modern designs that are not as functional and certainly do not have the same aesthetic appeal. In some cases, as on parts of the line over Sharnbrook, additional modern posts have been provided on the fast lines to duplicate the information given by the original Midland posts at a different level across on the goods lines (now the slow line). There has been surprisingly little re-mileposting to take account of the rationalisations of recent years. Derby station is one such example, but there are few others. Perhaps a case could be made for some replica Midland posts to provide a nice continuous sequence from Chinley North Junction via the Hope Valley (i.e. 174 miles) through to Edgeley Junction via New Mills South Junction, the Hazel Grove junctions, and Davenport.



The 138 milepost at Idridgehay on the Wirksworth Branch.

Thursday 15 November 2007

Lewisham 1957

Lewisham 1957
When the driver of a steam train passed warning
signals and ploughed into the back of a stationary electric train,
the accident was serious enough - but when the collision took out the
supports of an overhead flyover, bringing 350 tons of steel bridge
crashing down, disaster turned to tragedy.

The combination of a dark winter evening, thick fog, signals missed, trains running out of prop­er order and the collapse of a heavy girder bridge led to the worst ever accident on the Southern Region of British Railways.

The two trains involved in the initial collision at Lewisham, in the south-east of London, were overcrowded, with nearly 1500 passengers in the 10 coaches of the electric train and 700 passengers in the main line steam train which ran into it. Casualties were inevitably high: 89 passengers and a train guard were killed and over 100 passengers were seriously injured.
Rescuers work in the wreckage of the 4.56pm Cannon Street to Ramsgate train with the collapsed bridge girders above them. The second coach was totally crushed; this is the third coach (No 4378), the front part of which was destroyed.
The line was equipped with colour light signals controlled partly by track circuits which, although installed about 30 years earlier, were just as effec­tive as the newer installations of the 1950s. So how did the collision happen?

Fog causes disruption

Wednesday 4 December 1957 was one of those days when fog had been hanging around the Thames basin in London. By dusk it had thickened up in places so that visibility was little more than 10 to 15 yards. Elsewhere, visibility was better at about 50 yards. The eastern section of the Southern Region, with its dense network of routes out of the main London termini, was badly affect­ed and trains from Cannon Street and Charing Cross were running late and out of order.

The routes from these two termini combined in a complex track layout as they approached London Bridge, but by New Cross there were just four tracks - down and up local and down and up through - all equipped with colour light signals. At St Johns, the next station, a branch diverged from the local lines towards Lewisham Junction, while the local and through lines curved sharply to the right under a massive girder overbridge carry­ing the railway from Nunhead to Lewisham.

At about 6pm several trains were running on the down through line between London Bridge, New Cross, St Johns and beyond. The 5.05pm Cannon Street to Hastings train, steam hauled by a Schools class 4-4-0, had left Cannon Street 38 minutes late; it passed through St Johns at 6pm.

The train had lost more time during its journey as the driver, cautious after passing successive yel­low signals, searched for signals in the fog. Even though colour light signals with their powerful electric lights can penetrate fog, in places the fog was so dense that night that the beams of light could barely be seen more than 20 yards away. The fireman of the 5.05 train said afterwards that some could not be seen even at that distance.

The driver of the 4-4-0 was seated on the left-hand side of the engine. Even though the boiler of the Schools class locomotive was not as large as those of other engines - notably the Battle of Britain class which was involved in the accident -his view of signals on the right-hand side of the track was partially obscured. As the train contin­ued running slowly on towards Hither Green he asked his fireman on the right-hand side of the engine to look out for the signals through the fog.

Three minutes behind the steam train was the 5.16pm Cannon Street to Orpington electric train. With the driver right at the front and no massive boiler to obscure his vision, the driver had a better view of the signals both on the right and left. Even so, some signals were still difficult to pick out in the fog until they were very close. The train was travelling slowly, running past successive yellow signals as it was following the Hastings train ahead.

A few minutes behind was the 5.25pm Charing Cross to Hastings train, formed of a diesel-electric unit, with the driver right at the front like the elec­tric train ahead. It had passed green signals until North Kent East Junction on the London side of New Cross, but then slowed as its driver saw yel­low signals through New Cross and St Johns until it was stopped by a red signal at Parks Bridge. This was the setting for the drama which followed.


Diagram of the track in the immediate area of the accident
Signalling system
The signals at St Johns were controlled from the signalbox near the station, although a lever could not be pulled to clear a signal if a train was on the section of line beyond that signal. Many of the signals not controlling junctions were automatic and not worked by levers. The next signalbox ahead was Parks Bridge Junction which controlled the local and through trains and also a connection to the Mid Kent branch to Hayes.Trains were not offered and accepted as in manual block working but were simply described on the train describer. These clockwork instruments consisted of a clock face with a pointer towards up to 12 descriptions around the face and levers operated by the signalman to identify trains to the next signalbox down the line. There were two describers for each track, one to say what type of train was coming and one to say where it was going

Driver's view of signals
Normally signals were on the left of the line, but those between New Cross and St Johns were on the right. This was partly for space reasons and partly because when the signals were installed in the 1920s many of the steam engines on the line at that time had right-hand drive.
Later Southern steam engines had the driver's controls on the left, so that the right-hand signals had to be picked out before becoming obscured by the locomotive boiler. The extent to which the boiler restricted the driver's view depended on the type of locomotive. The Battle of Britain class Pacific involved in the collision at St Johns had a particularly wide, flat-sided casing, restricting the forward vision of the driver to a narrow spectacle glass.
In fog, if the driver could not see the signals on the right, he would either cross the cab to look out of the right-hand side or ask his fireman to look out for the signals for him.
It was doubtful whether the driver of the Ramsgate train realized he could not see the signals through the fog. He did not cross the cab, and only asked the fireman to look out when he saw the lights of St Johns station.
Events leading to disaster
The evening of 4 December 1957 was foggy and there were long delays to the crowded Southern Region rush-hour trains leaving the centre of London for Kent.
The 4.56pm Cannon Street to Ramsgate express, powered by a Battle of Britain class Pacific No 34066 Spitfire, was following the 5.18 Charing Cross to Hayes suburban electric train on the down fast line through St Johns. The St Johns signalbox controlled some of the busiest lines in the world, using continuous track circuiting to operate four-aspect colour light signals.
The local train responded to a red light and drew to a halt just beyond the overbridge carrying the Nunhead to Lewisham line over the main line. The driver of the following express, however, passed first a double yellow and then a single yellow warning signal, before finally applying the brakes as the train passed the red signal which was meant to protect the train in front. By then it was too late and the steam train ploughed into the back of the stationary local.
The accident left 90 people dead and 109 seriously injured, making it the third worst disaster in British railway history.

Battle of Britain class 4-6-2 No 34066 Spitfire which headed the Ramsgate train was repaired and returned to service. It continued to be based at Stewarts Lane depot and used on main line services to the Kent coast until electrification in 1961. After that it was used on surviving steam services on the main line out of Waterloo to the south west until it was withdrawn for scrap

Signalman's confusion

The signalman at Parks Bridge could not see the train in the fog. He did not know which train it was or where it was going. He thought from the train describer that it was an electric train for the Mid Kent line which branched off to the right at Parks Bridge.


The signalman could not clear the signals to the Mid Kent line because he already had a train com­ing on the up through line from Bromley North, and also another heading down the Mid Kent line from Lewisham station.


The diesel train driver telephoned the signal­man from the signalpost to identify the train, but the signalman did not know from which signal the driver was speaking and thought the driver had given the number of the signal behind.


In the meantime the 5.18pm Charing Cross to Hayes, which had left Charing Cross 30 minutes late - three minutes behind the diesel -approached St Johns. This was the electric train that the signalman at Parks Bridge had mistaken the diesel for. Its driver had seen the yellow sig­nals at St Johns and drew to a halt at the signal showing red behind the diesel train. The back of
the 5.18pm train was on the curve just beyond the Nunhead to Lewisham overbridge.


The 4.56pm steam train from Cannon Street to Ramsgate, hauled by Battle of Britain class 4-6-2 No 34066 Spitfire, had been badly delayed on the empty run from the sidings to Rotherhithe Road. It did not leave Cannon Street until 6.08pm but then had green signals as far as New Cross.


The next three signals, all on the right of the line, were at double yellow, single yellow and red, the last being at the country end of St Johns plat­form.


Driver W J Trew was on the left of the cab and his fireman, C D Hoare, had seen the green signal at New Cross and called across to tell Trew what aspect it was showing. Then Hoare carried on fir­ing ready for the start of the climb to the North Downs, assuming that Trew would see the next two signals. Although these stood on the right of the track, they were on a left-hand curve and, in clear weather, would be seen easily by the driver in spite of the restrictions caused by the huge boil­er. Neither driver nor fireman were expecting the fog to be so thick at this point. Whether Trew actually saw the next two signals telling him to

slow down was never established.


The next thing Trew saw was the station lights as the train ran into St Johns. Just as Trew called to Hoare to look out for the signal at the end of the platform, Hoare saw the glow of the signal light through the thick fog. It was red.


Hoare called the indication to Trew. The driver pulled down the brake handle to apply the brake, but it was too late. Just 138 yards beyond the red signal was the back of the 5.18pm Charing Cross to Hayes electric train, standing on the rising gra­dient with its brakes hard on.


The Ramsgate train was travelling at around 30mph, and the brake blocks had hardly begun to grip the wheels when the big Pacific locomotive ploughed into the rear driver's cab of the electric train. The force of the collision thrust the rear two coaches of the electric train forward and as these were both of a stronger BR standard pattern than those ahead of it, the ninth coach over-rode and completely destroyed the weaker body of the eighth coach.


The sudden stop by the engine caused the lead­ing coach of the Ramsgate train to burst out to the left of the curve. This forced the tender up and out immediately beneath the flyover, where it hit and displaced one of the stanchions supporting the bridge girders above.


Within seconds of the initial collision 350 tons of steel bridge collapsed on to the leading coaches of the Ramsgate train. What remained of the first coach after the collision was crushed by the bridge. The whole of the second coach was flat­tened and the leading part of the third was wrecked. Of those killed it was thought that 37 were in the electric train, mostly in the eighth coach, and 49 were in the front three coaches of the steam train. Remarkably, the engine itself was not derailed and damage to it was not extensive.


A couple of minutes after the accident, the 5.22pm Holborn Viaduct to Dartford train approached the collapsed bridge. Fortunately it was moving slowly up to a red signal, and when the motorman saw the girders at an angle he was able to stop the train just in time.


Rescuers carefully remove a survivor on a stretcher from the seventh coach of the Charing Cross to Hayes suburban electric train.

Driver's shock
Driver Trew and Fireman Hoare survived the crash, but Trew was in a severe state of shock. What signals he saw - indeed if he saw either of the two caution signals - will never be known. At first he said that he had seen the yellow signals, then later he denied having seen the signals at all. Hoare had not looked for the signals since he thought Trew had seen them, and he had not realized that the fog would be so thick.
Trew was tried on a charge of manslaughter, but the jury could not agree a verdict. A second trial was ordered and he was found not guilty.

What went wrong?
The inspecting officer who chaired the inquiry into the collision placed the blame for it solely on the driver of the Ramsgate train. He concluded that the driver did not see the two signals at caution and the St Johns signal at red and did not apply the brake until his fireman called out that the signal was red.
The fireman's actions were not criticized since he probably did not realize how thick the fog was in the cutting between New Cross and St Johns.
The signalman at Parks Bridge mistakenly stopped the Hastings diesel train thinking it was bound for the Mid Kent line, but he was in no way responsible for the collision.




The scene from the wrecked bridge, looking south , on Friday 6 December after the engine of the Ramsgate train had been removed. A further disaster was averted on 4 December when the driver of a train approaching on the left-hand track over the bridge saw the leaning girders and stopped his train. It ran on to the bridge and was leaning but did not derail. All passengers were safely evacuated.

Action taken
Like many inquiries at this period into accidents caused by drivers passing signals at danger, the inspecting officer recommended the adoption of the warning type of automatic train control, today called the automatic warning system (AWS).
Although the SR management had their reservations about AWS, it was eventually installed. However, the system has since been blamed for several accidents where repetitive cancellation by drivers acknowledging caution signals has led to accidental cancellation at red signals. British Rail tested a new system -automatic train protection (ATP) -which had the potential to prevent a train from running into danger. But with privatisation looming, the political will wasn't there, and after privatisation the willingness of the private sector to fund installations of such equipment is non-existant as its not profitable.

Wednesday 14 November 2007

Thirsk 2nd November 1892

Thirsk, Manor House 2nd November 1892



The fear that many men have of being seen to cry or show their fears has a large part to play in this story. This, together with a total lack of sensitivity on the part of the secondary players in the drama, a fear of the Company and a fear of causing delays to trains, brought about the Manor House crash.

James Holmes was 33 years old and had worked for the North Eastern Railway as a signalman since he joined the service in 1881. Since 1891 he had been working Manor House signal-box on the York to Darlington main line, three miles north of Thirsk and five miles south of Northallerton. It was a small, brick-built cabin on the up side of the line with seven levers to work distant, home and starting signals on the up and down main lines and a point lever for a short siding on the down side. The next signal-box to the north was Otterington, the next south was Avenue Junction, each roughly 1¼ miles away. He lived 2½ miles from the box with his wife and several children in a small house at the village of Thornton le Moor. Every day, twice a day, he walked through the lanes to work, come snow, rain or sun, on twelve hour shifts; he was happy enough, for the hours were no longer than in any other job and, after the walk, he was in the warm and the dry and his pay of 20 shillings a week was above average for that area and it was regular.

Sunday 30th October 1892 was his day off and he rested so well that he spent all Monday working in his orchard picking apples for market before walking to the signal-box for the twelve hour night shift. Between 18:00 and 06:00, James Holmes signaled about 95 trains including several very important expresses such as the Up Scotsman with Pullman cars. At 06:00 he was relieved by his mate, but he waited until the signalman from Avenue Junction arrived at Manor House so they could both walk home to Thornton together. He arrived at home at about 07:15,
put his bag in the kitchen and began to clear the ashes from the fire to relight it, and while he was doing this his wife came in to say that their youngest daughter, Rosy, who had been unwell for several days was decidedly unwell and was breathing heavily. James said “ I will go to bed now, put her in with me. You get Teddy off to school, see to the other children and when you've done bring me some tea and a bite to eat.” Two hours later, Mrs Holmes brought James his breakfast; he ate and fell asleep at 09:30. Two and a half hours later he was shocked out of a deep sleep by his wife, shaking him and shouting “Jim, Jim, Rosys in a fit!” James tumbled out of bed and told his wife to fetch a neighbour, an older woman. This worthy took one look at the child and said she needed a doctor. The doctor lived in Northallerton, five miles away. James Holmes walked and ran the mile to Otterington Station, got a lift on the down goods train and hurried to the doctors house only to be told that he had gone out on his rounds - including calls in Thornton le Moor. James went to the pub, had a half and a sandwich, and then set out on the long walk home, hoping to meet the doctor on the way. He did not see him. He arrived home to find his wife in tears and their daughter Rosy dead.

Mrs Holmes was devastated and could not be left alone, James was shocked and physically exhausted. He had had 2½ hours sleep in the previous 29 hours, he had walked nine miles since 06:00 that morning and that on very little food. He now set out to walk the mile or so to Otterington station to send a telegram to his mother in York, to ask her to come to Thornton. He also intended to ask his Inspector, based in Northallerton, to relieve him of duty on the approaching nightshift. He sent his telegram to York and asked his Station Master, Mr Kirby, to arrange relief for him that night “ as I have just had a child die very sudden and Im in bad fettle for work”. There must be times when the English “stiff upper lip” is a bad thing. This was such an occasion. Mr Kirby was unimpressed by James child dying and said that he would do what he could with the Northallerton Inspector but that he, James, must go home, prepare for work and return to the station later to see if he had been relieved or not. James Holmes walked another mile home.



He returned to Otterington station at 19:30, having slept for only 2½ hours in the preceeding 35 hours. Station Master Kirby may not have known this, but he knew James was tired and distressed,“in bad fettle for work”. When he told him that he could not be relieved, James said: "its a bad job. I shouldn't care so much for myself, I am most bothered about my wife". James would reveal his true feelings no more than that, while Kirby, scared of having delays to trains set at his door, did not suggest the obvious solution, that of switching Manor House box out of
circuit. Before James set out for the walk along the track to work, he spoke with the signalman in Otterington box, saying:“Harry, I am about done up for work. I never been off my legs since 12 oclock. I had to walk from Northallerton and twice to Otterington and back”. Never did he utter the precise words "I am unfit for work", and this was used later against him. He gave all kinds of warnings - his very appearance should have been enough - but neither he nor anyone else wanted to stand firm and refuse to work.

He worked well for the first part of the shift and by 03:40 on the 2nd November was actually priding himself on how well he was bearing up. By that time he had been awake and working hard for 48 hours with only 2½ hours sleep. The night was cold with patchy fog and the trains were running seven or eight an hour, one passing the box every 8½ or 9 minutes. The up Scotsman that night was running in two parts with a goods train in between them.

The first part of the express ran past the box at 03:38; James gave it “On line” to his mate at Avenue Junction, sent “Line clear” (corresponding to “Train out of section” in more modern times) to Otterington and put his signals to danger behind the express. It was at this point that the stamina of James Holmes ran out. No sooner than he had sat down in his chair, he was instantly asleep. Not ordinary sleep, but the deep sleep of an exhausted man. Some may have experience of it, a strange sleep where things like bell codes still have the power to command reflex actions from a man. Harry Eden in Otterington box rang “Call Attention” for the goods train, James got out of his chair, gave the road and went back to sleep. He in all probability never woke while he was working his instruments.

The goods train driver found Manor House signals against him and came to a stand at the home signal at 03:51. He did not blow his whistle and James Holmes slept on. Harry Eden was reading by his fire when he received “Train on line” for the second part of the Scotch express at 04:00. Only then did he see his instruments for the section to Manor House were still showing “Train on line” for the goods train. The North Eastern Railway block signaling regulation allowed Harry to send the "Be Ready" signal to James Holmes at Manor House box even though the instrument showed the line was occupied (“Be Ready” was the equivalent of “Is line clear?”). The bellcode woke James Holmes who, hearing the express passenger code and seeing that he still had “Train on line” showing on his instrument, came to the instant conclusion that he had omitted to clear the instrument after the passing of the first part of the Scotch express. He had not entered the goods train in his register and had no recollection of it in his confused and exhausted state.

James at once gave "Line clear" from Avenue Junction and lowered his up line signals. After a minute or so, the goods train, which had been waiting in silence at the home signal for ten minutes, started off with a gentle chuff and a creaking of couplings. Meanwhile, the second part of the Scotch express, 13 coaches hauled by 2-4-0 No 178, went through Otterington at 55-60 mph on the dead straight, slightly falling gradient. James Holmes was now doubly confused. He heard the goods train starting and telephoned Harry Eden. “Is this the express passenger you
have asked?“ He said, and put the phone down. Eden was puzzled and went to his window, looking up the line towards Manor House. The sound of the crash came dully through the intervening mile and a quarter in spite of the fog.

The driver and fireman of No 178 were Roland Ewart and Edward Head. The train was a heavy one, and both locomotive and the fireman were taking a pounding as the driver did his best to keep time. At times, the fog was so thick that the driver was unable to see a signal until he was "on top of it"; at other times, such as when approaching Manor House distant signal, he saw it at a range of 50 yards. The fireman, stoking continuously on the small, overloaded engine , took no part in the signal business, placing his trust, indeed his life, in the steel nerves of Driver Ewart who took his train into an impenetrable wall of fog at 60 mph, trusting in the signalling. All this just to adhere to the timetable.

Driver Ewart saw the red triangle of lights on the rear of the goods train brake van at a range of 50 yards. He had no time to brake and the next thing he knew he was waking up, in mortal pain, on his back on the frost covered grass of a field 60 feet from the line-side. One thigh was smashed, his ribs broken. The conductor from the Pullman car „India„ found him and gave him some brandy, and together they watched as the first small, flickering flames grew to engulf the wreckage of the train. Fireman Head woke in the same field, utterly at a loss to know how he
got there. Physically uninjured, he staggered to his feet and set out to protect the rear of his train, but woke again in a farmhouse kitchen. He was taken to Northallerton hospital. Signalman James Holmes was so utterly devastated by what he had done that uninjured passengers coming to the signal box to see if there was space there for the wounded had to console him. One eye-witness said that if it had not been for the "sweet kindness" of one lady, he, the witness, firmly believed that Holmes would have lost his mind that night.

Ten people were killed, including George Petch, the guard of the goods train, and 39 were injured, trapped in the burning wreckage. Eight passenger carriages were destroyed, including the Pullman sleeping car „India„, and eight wagons from the goods train were lost. An inquest was held on the deceased and the jury's verdict was "culpable negligence" on the part of Holmes, "but we are convinced that if Holmes had been relieved when he so urgently appealed this would not have happened and the persons really responsible for the deaths are the Directors
of the North Eastern Railway". This verdict must be a classic case of „running with the hare and hunting with the hounds„ and although the "persons really responsible for the deaths were the Directors of the North Eastern Railway", it was James Holmes who stood trial for the manslaughter of George Petch.



There was a great deal of public sympathy for James, and while letters to The Times castigated the North Eastern Railway Directors, James and his family were recovering somewhat from the shocks they had suffered in the Sussex home of Henry Farmer-Atkinson, MP for Boston, who had invited them with their children. The trial was set for the 2nd of December 1892 at York Assizes. The judge was on the side of James Holmes - as far as he could make that plain - and warned the jury that „manslaughter„ is a very difficult thing to prove and every case has to be judged on its merits, but the essence was "causing the death of another by gross or culpable negligence, and Holmes had a great sorrow on him at the time and was not himself, he was distressed and tired".

Many searching questions were put to Station Master Kirby and to District Inspector Pick by the defense counsel.

“Why did you not give Holmes a companion in the box - a porter, say, from Otterington?”

“Why did you not switch the box out?”

“Why did you not realise the seriousness of Holmes condition after his protests at having to work?”

“Why were there no relief signalman to take his place in the box?”

In reply to the last question it was revealed that the North Eastern Railway considered that 17 relief men for over 300 signalmen was an entirely reasonable provision. The verdict of the jury was that James Holmes was guilty of the manslaughter of George Petch but added a very strong plea for mercy. The learned jidge, in passing sentence, said that this was the only verdict that could be brought. However, he evidently felt the mood of the time because he then said to Holmes. “I do not want to add to your troubles - you have suffered a great deal already. I bind you over for 12 months in the sum of £50 pounds”.

Tuesday 13 November 2007

BR Shunters 1

British Rail shunter's of various classes in work and preservation



BR Class 08 No 08765 in EWS's distinctive livery.



BR Class 08 No 08765 in EWS livery.